I'm not seeing what value Luminar will give me. Sky replacement in Photoshop will be there soon. Topaz Sharpen AI is excellent (if very slow). I much prefer working with Luminosity Masks with the Lumenzia Panel in Photoshop. I can't see myself ever upgrading with them again. Its jumped on the bandwagon of AI but may not turn out to be much of an improvement. They could have called the next version Luminar 5 and had their normal upgrade charge but they are charging alot more for switching, got it months in advance of being ready and we have bought a pig in a poke. Download this Free Luminar Ai Template Portrait compliments of. Each time you use them, AI analyses objects, colours, and scenery in your photo and applies the best possible edit based on its analysis. You can think of Templates as automatic AI-powered presets. There are certain issues unresolved in Luminar 4. Templates are the most significant change you’ll see by upgrading from Luminar 4 to Luminar AI. The switch to Luminar AI has left a little bit of bad taste in Luminar 4 users. It's better value for money that Luminar because I don't use Luminar that often. For me personally Abode Photoshop / Lightroom is good value for money as I use it all the time. Going forward we won't believe authentic images as we will be swamped with swapped skies. It's been around a while and maybe we've been fooled by images that we thought were real but are actually sky replacements. Sky replacement is a bit of a moral quagmire. Sky replacement is good but Adobe have spotted that and are at last reacting to it. I think presets maybe suit the image it was set up for but doesn't work so well for other images. It's more of a platform for selling presets (which are not great). Upgrades have got more expensive, not much feature improvement.
0 kommentar(er)
